Learn from our office rental mistakes
We’re all trusting souls here at The Furious Towers; and until now have rarely sought legal advice on matters such as office rental contracts – hitherto baulking at the ‘high’ fees charged by legal eagles. Sadly, hindsight now taunts us with the revelation that it would have been so much cheaper and less stressful if we had sought that legal advice at the outset.
I won’t name the landlord – although anyone can readily guess at it from our address – suffice to say that they are an international company; and one that we misguidedly placed our trust in. It’s fair to state that it’s shear size lulled us into a false assumption that they were ‘bound to be one of the good guys’. How wrong could we have been.
Any organisation is only as good as those charged with delivering the service at the coal face; and we’re still under a protracted complaints process that is stubbornly wedged in the treacle layer of ‘area management’ – but do hope to have their CEO aware of our story as soon as possible.
Our tale of woe starts when we had to ‘chase up’ the landlord when we were only 3-weeks away from the end of our lease and hadn’t received any renewal documentation. I’m sure you’ll agree that this is not a great time to discover that the new landlords (they took over from the existing company) were increasing the rent by a third! With prices more apt to the South East of England (rather than an industrial estate to the south of Lincoln) we had no time to find alternative office space – and we’re pressed for a decision on renewal after only a week of receiving this bombshell.
A cursory read of the renewal (sorry – we THOUGHT it was a renewal) revealed similar Terms and Conditions along with an agreement to comply with House Rules (now my two least favourite words in the English language). We were verbally assured that House Rules were more relevant to ‘managed centres’ (of which we do not belong) and so signed on the dotted line for an 18-month ‘extension’ (the only palatable option that would be cheap enough to avoid having to leave an office and work from a house for a while).
Infuriatingly, the next Invoice included an extra £350 for an additional deposit – done to uplift the deposit held by the landlord to reflect the new monthly fees – which was unannounced and entirely unwelcome. Requests to delay this uplift were met with a stonewall of ‘it’s company policy’ – it is in the House Rules apparently. Having yet to receive a copy of this elusive tome, I once again requested a copy.
The next unwelcome revelation was that the inclusive IT and telephone package was altering; and calls would now be at an additional cost. This didn’t concern us too greatly as most of our communications are electronic in nature – even though the projected costs were extortionate – considering they are all VOIP calls from the landlord’s server and therefore very cheap to make. Apparently, it was done because of changes to the House Rules (another request for a copy was made).
Most recently (I daren’t say ‘the last’ at the risk of tempting fate) was the 3-days of notice that (there has been a change in House Rules would you believe?) there would now be a line rental cost of £49 per month per phone for the first phone, and £25 pmpp for the second line. Expecting a full Sky Television package at this price we ungraciously handed back the second line immediately!
Having now finally received a copy of the House Rules we now discover that there will be a rent review after the 12-month period, and a ‘move out’ fee of around £25 per square metre when we move out (which will be around £1000) – oh and the discovery that we are no longer allowed to use ‘other’ IT/Telephone providers; without a ‘corking fee’ being charged for the privilege.
Calls with our solicitor – which are about a year too late – reveal that the ‘renewal’ to the exiting contract is not a renewal at all. It is an entirely new contract; and all previously made agreements are in fact null and void.
In short, we have a situation where our landlord can levy further charges at will – by simply amending the House Rules (in which it states that these can be amended at anytime – with or without notice to the tenant). We now have to ‘watch and wait’ – hoping that we can see out this contract without our overheads rocketing too far!
Our lesson learned is simple; carry out the due diligence, and trust no one – no matter their size and reputation – pay now for the legal advice; and not ‘through the nose’ later.
Do you have any costly business lessons that others could benefit from learning? Why not share the benefits of your experiences in the comments section below?
Get the latest Furious Blogs delivered straight to your inbox for free once a month – simply enter your email address here.
Like what you’ve read? Please share this article by clicking on one of the Social Media icons at ‘share with friends’ below.
- Diesel Mis-information Confusing Consumers and Costing Billions - June 21, 2017
- Rising inflation a ‘cause for concern’ for freelancers - June 16, 2017
- Recruiters urged to check suppliers in wake of £45m fraud case - June 14, 2017
- Artificial Intelligence moves up small and medium sized legal firms’ agendas - June 9, 2017
- Increase in the numbers of IT security vacancies reported in wake of cyber attacks - June 7, 2017
- The Changing Face of the Global Maritime Industry - June 5, 2017
- Internet of Things Security – are you failing to prepare? - May 31, 2017
- Employers ignore rise of gig-economy at their risk - May 26, 2017
- Aluminium set to make a charge on battery technology - May 24, 2017
- Artificial Intelligence will enhance talent acquisition - May 22, 2017